Yeah this reading was very confusing.
my first question is if this paper actually had a structure to it. I kind of noticed a pattern the way he was talking first about reproduction then about paintings and then videos, drama and stage work, and then dadaism. It was a lot of random things that i really dont know if it had a stucture. If it did I would be a lot less confused. I dont know what he was actually trying to prove.
my second question is I dont know what he meant when he kept on saying "cult". I kept picturing a secret cult in the middle of the woods dancing around a fire... but i'm sure thats not what he meant.
