ideas? And if they are groups of classifications that do differ, are there further subgroups with these concepts of reproduction?
2) In section IX the article likens film makers to "magicians" in that their hands never touch the reproduced image but isn't this false? In olden times and even more so in current times, don't film makers have a very active role in how the world is presented, not only in story or physiologically but through lighting, various equipments used, people and scenarios portrays and so on?
