this reading was tough. i think i understood the part about film the most. i kind of want just a general explanation, but here are my 2 specific questions-
"the result was that one could expect it not only to exploit the proletariat with increasing intensity, but ultimately to create conditions which would make it possible to abolish capitalism itself." what? how?
he compares art that is in a fixed place to art that can be moved to different locations. is it more important for the art to be viewed in its original location, or for the art to be accessible to lots of people?
